Friend or Enemies? SCRUM vs. Kanban

It’s surprising how many people have trouble telling the difference between Kanban and Scrum. Both of these phrases are frequently used together in the same sentence. They are both flexible techniques with significant differences. Even while both agile approaches are intended to simplify workflow and teamwork partnerships in order to achieve the best outcomes, understanding the distinctions between the two is crucial in determining which is best for one’s workplace.

According to reports, scrum is used by teams significantly more than a sprint. Scrum is used by 56 per cent of units, while the Kanban framework is used by only 5% of teams. Scrumban, a mix of Scrum and Kanban, is used by 8% of teams, while the remainder utilises alternative agile frameworks.

Do you want to learn how Scrum differs from Kanban? To find out, keep reading!


Kanban is a lean manufacturing term that literally means “signboard” or “billboard.” It’s founded on the idea that everything should be visualized. The workflow and processes are streamlined and managed using visualizations. It is based on the principle of total waste elimination. Kanban attempts to improve workflow and processes through the use of graphics.

The fundamental goal of Kanban is to ensure that the workflow runs smoothly and at an ideal speed by recognising and resolving possible faults in the system. It continues to explore and improve the system by making policies explicit and accurately documenting the process. It assists you in improving collaboration by implementing continuous and evolutionary adjustments utilising models and empirical scientific approaches.

Work-in-progress (WIP) restrictions are a core Kanban principle that all teams utilise to actively control their workflow.

Kanban is used by companies such as Nike, Zara, and Pixar Studios.

Kanban Board is a system for organising work.

The Kanban board initiates the visualisation process, which is an important Kanban technique. The following is how it works:

  • All team members may monitor how tasks are progressing through the process and verify their current locations, such as to do, in-process, and done, using the Kanban board.
  • Because the board is so simple, there aren’t many restrictions, so it’s best to break the task into more clearly defined stages to make the process go more smoothly.
  • Kanban entails more than just putting items on the board; it also entails using a “pull process.”
  • To establish team capacity and discover and correct bottlenecks to optimise the optimal flow, the key is to set up an easy way to visualise the job and provide a space for social interactions.

Kanban’s Advantages

Kanban’s advantages include increased work visibility and transparency, enhanced communication and attention, and improved control flow. Many people complain about problems with team cooperation, which is one of the reasons for using Kanban.

Kanban’s Challenges As an agile method, using Kanban is not as straightforward to apply as it appears. Due to a lack of sufficient training and misunderstanding, people are frequently unable to use Kanban to its full potential. It’s a complicated tool with many powers, and only those who fully comprehend it will be able to use it to its full capacity, while others will be unable to achieve optimal outcomes.


Scrum is an Empirical Process framework for assisting teams in working collaboratively. It aids in delivering maximum business value to customers in the shortest time possible. A scrum is an iterative approach for dividing large issues into smaller pieces.

Scrum is a project management methodology that strives to tackle complicated challenges while delivering high-quality solutions.

It provides product development services to all types of businesses. Scrum is used by companies like Apple, Google, Facebook, Yahoo, Spotify, and others.

Scrum Master

A Scrum board depicts the visual status of a sprint and is divided into stages of the process. A Scrum board is reset after each sprint, unlike the Kanban board, which does not have this idea.

A Scrum team regularly checks the work, and the team analyzes, communicates and corrects the problems during a daily scrum meeting, which lasts 15 minutes. Cross-functionality is emphasised heavily.

The members of the scrum team are separated into three roles:

1. Product Owner

2. Developers

3. Scrum Master

A Scrum project is led by a Scrum Master, who is sometimes referred to as servant leaders, implying pseudo leadership that is less concerned with management. The Scrum Team is made up of people who create products and estimate their time. A ‘sprint’ in Scrum has a basic 30-day maximum duration. Sprints are used to make progress. Sprints are short-term objectives that can last anywhere from one to thirty days. It may involve days of labour and a day of the sprint review, depending on the sprint duration. After each sprint, the goal is to deliver a possibly shippable product. The length of the sprint determines the planning and reviewing phases, as well as the product’s release duration. Scrum detects everything that prevents the delivery from taking place.

Scrum’s Advantages

Scrum entails meticulous short-term planning and continuous feedback. It’s a straightforward, empirical procedure that encourages transparency and demands accountability. It optimizes the working environment and reduces organizational overhead by employing very simple procedures and artefacts.

Disadvantages of Using Scrum

There’s a good risk the product will fail if people aren’t committed or cooperative. Other than that, Scrum is judged inapplicable in a number of situations, including projects with a predetermined time and price rate, as well as projects with a fixed scope. Scrum isn’t a one-size-fits-all solution for all problems, and it can be excessive in other cases.

Scrum vs. Kanban

Major Differences Between Kanban and Scrum

Rather than asking Kanban versus. Scrum, start asking Kanban or Scrum, or even Kanban and Scrum. The following are the significant distinctions between the two:

  • Kanban’s ideology is built on a fixed task scope and time measurement. Scrum, on the other hand, requires a set time schedule and measures work in order to assist teams collaborate.
  • Roles: Kanban is adaptable to changes and focuses on forecasting and time-boxing. There are no predefined roles for the workers, and they are not required to commit. Scrum is centred on planning, and individuals have established responsibilities such as scrum master.
  • Estimation: In Scrum, estimation is required, however in Kanban, it is optional.
  • Scrum employs velocity as a metric, while Kanban uses lead time, cycle, or work in progress.
  • Scrum is a structured method, whereas Kanban is based on continuous change and improvement.

Scrum vs. Kanban: What’s the Difference?

Scrum and Kanban are two well-known agile frameworks that are quite distinct from one another. They each have their own set of advantages and disadvantages, with the goal of improving the working environment in their own unique way. As a result, deciding which one to utilise requires a detailed analysis of their working environment.

how useful was this post?

click on star to rate it.

Author :


View posts by Aparna

hire Coach

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>


Enjoy this blog? Please spread the word :)